Detection of Real-World Trips in At-Fall Risk Community Dwelling Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors

Shirley Handelzalts; Neil B Alexander; Nicholas Mastruserio; Linda V Nyquist; Debra M Strasburg; Lauro V Ojeda

doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00514

Detection of Real-World Trips in At-Fall Risk Community Dwelling Older Adults Using Wearable Sensors

Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Sep 2:7:514. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00514. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Shirley Handelzalts^{1

2

3}, Neil B Alexander^{1

4}, Nicholas Mastruserio⁵, Linda V Nyquist¹, Debra M Strasburg¹, Lauro V Ojeda⁵

Affiliations

¹ Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
² Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
³ Department of Physical Therapy, Loewenstein Rehabilitation Hospital, Ra'anana, Israel.
⁴ VA Ann Arbor Health Care System Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
⁵ Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Abstract

Background: Near-falls such as a trip, slip, stumble, or misstep involve a loss of balance (LOB) that does not result in a fall, occur more frequently than actual falls, and are associated with an increased fall risk. To date, studies have largely involved detection of simulated laboratory LOBs using wearable devices in young adults. Data on the detection of and kinematics of naturally occurring LOBs in people at high risk of falling are lacking. This may provide a new way to identify older adults at high risk for falls. We aimed to explore key body kinematics underlying real-world trips in at-fall risk community dwelling older adults wearing inertial measurement units (IMU). Methods: Five community-dwelling older adults with a history of falls who reported trips during the study period participated. They wore a voice recorder and 4 IMUs mounted on feet, lower back and wrist for two consecutive weeks to provide a record of the context and timing of LOB events. Sensor data prior to time-stamped voice recording of a trip were processed in order to visually identify unusual foot trajectories and lower back and arm orientations. Then, data of feet, lower back and wrist position and orientation were combined to create a three-dimensional animation representing the estimated body motion during the noted time segments in order to corroborate the occurrence of a trip. Events reported as a trip by the participant and identified as a trip by a researcher, blinded to voice recordings description, were included in the final analysis. Results: A total of 18 trips obtained from five participants were analyzed. Twelve trips occurred at home, three outside and for three the location was not reported. Trips were identified in the sensor data by observing (1) additional peaks to the typical foot velocity signal during swing phase; (2) increased velocity of the contralateral foot and (3) sharp changes in lower back pitch angles. Conclusions: Our approach demonstrates the feasibility of identifying and studying the mechanisms and context underlying trip-related LOBs in at-fall risk older adults during real world activities.

Keywords: accelerometers; balance; inertial measurement units; monitoring; near-falls; walking.

Abstract

Grants and funding