The acceptance of Covid-19 tracking technologies: The role of perceived threat, lack of control, and ideological beliefs

PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238973. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238973. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

New technological solutions play an important role in preventing the spread of Covid-19. Many countries have implemented tracking applications or other surveillance systems, which may raise concerns about privacy and civil rights violations but may be also perceived by citizens as a way to reduce threat and uncertainty. Our research examined whether feelings evoked by the pandemic (perceived threat and lack of control) as well as more stable ideological views predict the acceptance of such technologies. In two studies conducted in Poland, we found that perceived personal threat and lack of personal control were significantly positively related to the acceptance of surveillance technologies, but their predictive value was smaller than that of individual differences in authoritarianism and endorsement of liberty. Moreover, we found that the relationship between the acceptance of surveillance technologies and both perceived threat and lack of control was particularly strong among people high in authoritarianism. Our research shows that the negative feelings evoked by the unprecedented global crisis may inspire positive attitudes towards helpful but controversial surveillance technologies but that they do so to a lesser extent than ideological beliefs.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Attitude*
  • COVID-19
  • Contact Tracing / instrumentation
  • Contact Tracing / methods*
  • Coronavirus Infections / epidemiology
  • Coronavirus Infections / prevention & control
  • Coronavirus Infections / psychology*
  • Culture
  • Humans
  • Mobile Applications*
  • Pandemics / prevention & control
  • Pneumonia, Viral / epidemiology
  • Pneumonia, Viral / prevention & control
  • Pneumonia, Viral / psychology*
  • Poland
  • Political Activism
  • Privacy
  • Quarantine / psychology*

Grants and funding

This paper was supported by the funds from the Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw granted by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education in the form of a subsidy for maintaining and developing the research potential in 2020 (DM); www.gov.pl/web/science. Preparation of this manuscript was financed from the funds of the Polish National Science Centre No 2018/30/E/HS6/00379 (AW); www.ncn.gov.pl. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.