Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Rikke Krüger Jensen; Henrik Hein Lauridsen; Andreas Duch Kiilerich Andresen; Rune Mygind Mieritz; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen; Werner Vach

doi:10.2147/CLEP.S263646

Diagnostic Screening for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug 19:12:891-905. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S263646. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Rikke Krüger Jensen^{1

2}, Henrik Hein Lauridsen¹, Andreas Duch Kiilerich Andresen³, Rune Mygind Mieritz⁴, Berit Schiøttz-Christensen^{5

6}, Werner Vach^{7

8}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
² Nordic Institute of Chiropractic and Clinical Biomechanics, Odense, Denmark.
³ Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart, Denmark.
⁴ Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark.
⁵ Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, University Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart, Denmark.
⁶ Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
⁷ Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
⁸ Basel Academy, Basel, Switzerland.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a self-administered diagnostic screening questionnaire for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) consisting of items with high content validity and to investigate the diagnostic value of the questionnaire and the items.

Patients and methods: A self-reported diagnostic LSS screening questionnaire was developed based on items from the existing literature describing key symptoms of LSS. The screening questionnaire (index test) was to be tested in a cohort of patients with persistent lumbar and/or leg pain recruited from a Danish publicly funded outpatient secondary care spine clinic with clinicians performing the reference test. However, to avoid unnecessary collection of data if the screening questionnaire proved to be of limited value, a case-control design was incorporated into the cohort design including an interim analysis. Additional cases for the case-control study were recruited at two Danish publicly funded spine surgery departments. Prevalence, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (OR) were calculated for each individual item, and AUC (area under the curve) was calculated to examine the performance of the full questionnaire.

Results: A 13-item Danish questionnaire was developed and tested in 153 cases and 230 controls. The interim analysis was not in favour of continuing the cohort study, and therefore, only results from the case-control study are reported. There was a positive association for all items except the presence of back pain. However, the association was only moderate with ORs up to 3.3. When testing the performance of the whole questionnaire, an AUC of 0.72 was reached with a specificity of 20% for a fixed sensitivity of 95%.

Conclusion: The items were associated with LSS and therefore have some potential to identify LSS patients. However, the association was not strong enough to provide sufficient accuracy for a diagnostic tool. Additional dimensions of symptoms of LSS need identification to obtain a reliable questionnaire for screening purposes.

Keywords: diagnostic screening; lumbar spinal stenosis; neurogenic claudication; questionnaire.

Grants and funding

There is no funding to report.