Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of 7 d vs. 10 d empirical antibiotic therapy in cases of acute pyogenic meningitis in children aged 3 mo to 14 y with rapid initial recovery.
Methods: A total of 96 children aged 3 mo to 14 y with acute pyogenic meningitis were randomized to either 7 d or 10 d therapy on Day 5 of the therapy, if they were in clinical remission and had improving cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) abnormalities. The primary outcome was treatment failure in each group within 10 d of enrolment or relapse of meningitis defined as recurrence of signs and symptoms of meningitis within 2 wk of discharge. Secondary outcome was the presence of sequelae in patient at 30 d and 90 d follow-up post discharge.
Results: Out of 111 screened children, 96 patients completed the trial, 48 in each group. There were 7 treatment failures and relapses each in the group receiving 7 d antibiotics while 6 failures and relapses each were seen in 10 d antibiotics group. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment failure in both the groups [2.1 (-0.12-0.16); p = 0.76]. No deaths or significant adverse effects of the drugs occurred during this study. Four cases of nosocomial sepsis were reported with 2 cases in each group. On subsequent 30 d and 90 d follow-up, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups regarding frequency of hearing impairment, frequency of hydrocephalus [-2.1 (-0.09-0.13); p = 0.65] and various neurological sequelae [6.2 (-0.06-0.19); p > 0.05].
Conclusions: Short course antibiotic therapy may be adequately effective for treatment of acute pyogenic meningitis beyond neonatal age in children with initial rapid recovery.
Keywords: Acute pyogenic meningitis; Effectiveness; Safety; Short course antibiotic therapy; Treatment failure.