Malignant mesothelioma in situ: diagnostic and clinical considerations

Pathology. 2020 Oct;52(6):635-642. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

Abstract

In situ stages of malignancy have been characterised in various neoplasms. Mesothelioma in situ (MIS) has been a controversial diagnosis, lacking clear diagnostic criteria and understanding as to whether it is truly a premalignant lesion in the progression of malignant mesothelioma (MM). Originally understood as a concept and defined as atypical mesothelial proliferation in the presence of invasion, it has now been suggested that loss of nuclear labelling for BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) in flat, non-invasive mesothelial lesions can define MIS. This study aimed to characterise BAP1 expression in a cohort of 19 patients diagnosed with MIS (either pure MIS, n=3, or MIS-predominant invasive MM, n=16) and to compare survival between MIS, MIS-predominant MM and MM (n=114) in order to gain insight into the characteristics of MIS. We defined pure MIS as any architectural pattern of surface mesothelial cells with loss of BAP1 in the absence of invasion, but in specimens with superficial stromal invasion we also accepted the original definition of cytologically and architecturally atypical mesothelial proliferation, in the absence of inflammatory features, with or without loss of BAP1. We observed that MIS associated with minimal invasion was associated with significantly improved survival compared to MM (8 months vs 22 months). This suggests that MIS is indeed a precursor to MM and that these cases represent earlier stage disease. Loss of BAP1 was present in 60% of mesotheliomas with invasion, so not all early cases can be detected by BAP1 loss, but our study provides evidence that BAP1 loss may be an early molecular alteration in MM pathogenesis in patients that have loss of BAP1. We confirm that BAP1 loss can be useful for diagnosis of pure MIS in surgical specimens, permitting earlier diagnosis. However, identification of a predominant MIS component with minimal invasion has prognostic and conceptual implications. Whilst no approved therapy is available for MIS, close follow up of patients with BAP1 mutation in mesothelial cells and/or diagnosis of MIS is required to monitor for disease progression and potentially investigate earlier treatment interventions.

Keywords: BAP1; Mesothelioma; diagnosis; in situ mesothelioma; prognosis.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cohort Studies
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Male
  • Mesothelioma / diagnosis*
  • Mesothelioma / pathology
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant / diagnosis*
  • Mesothelioma, Malignant / pathology
  • Mutation
  • Prognosis
  • Survival Analysis
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins / genetics*
  • Ubiquitin Thiolesterase / genetics*

Substances

  • BAP1 protein, human
  • Tumor Suppressor Proteins
  • Ubiquitin Thiolesterase