Introduction: The effectiveness of novel soft-tissue interventions relative to traditional ones requires further exploration. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the immediate effect of Instrument Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) compared to Vibration Massage or Light Hand Massage on hamstrings' flexibility and knee proprioception.
Methods: 16 healthy non-injured male participants (mean age 23.7 years, height 1.80 cms and body mass 77.7 kg) were randomly assigned to the following interventions: (a) 5min IASTM, (b) 5min Vibration Massage and (c) 8min Light Hand-Massage, sequentially delivered to all participants with an in-between 1-week time interval. A single application of each intervention was given over the hamstrings of their dominant leg (repeated measures under 3 different experimental conditions). An active knee angle reproduction proprioception test and the back-saver sit and reach flexibility test were performed before and immediately after each intervention. Reliability of outcomes was also assessed.
Results: Reliability for flexibility (ICC3,1 = 0.97-0.99/SEM = 0.83-1.52 cm) and proprioception (ICC3,1 = 0.83-0.88/SEM = 1.63-2.02°) was very good. For flexibility, statistically significant immediate improvement (p < 0.001) was noted in all 3 groups (1.61-3.23 cm), with no between-group differences. For proprioception, improvement in the IASTM (2.12°), Vibration Massage (0.32°) and Light Hand-Massage (1.17°) conditions was not statistically significant; no between-group differences were also evident.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that muscle flexibility was positively influenced immediately after a single intervention of IASTM, Vibration Massage or Light Hand Massage. Proprioception changes were not statistically significant either within or between groups. Further evaluation of those interventions in a larger population with hamstrings pathology is required.
Keywords: Fascia; Massage; Muscle tightness; Proprioception.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.