Aims of the study: The presence of colostomy has a major impact on quality of life that could potentially be improved by performing colonic irrigation (CI), yet few studies have assessed the impact of this technique on quality of life. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of life between two groups of patients having a colostomy; those practicing CI vs those not practicing CI.
Patients and methods: The French Federation of Ostomy (FFO) members were evaluated by a self-questionnaire assessing their experience of CI. Quality of life as assessed by the Stoma-QOL questionnaire was compared between patients practicing CI or not.
Results: In total 752 patients were eligible for the study. The median age was 75 years, and 47.26% were men. The median duration between stoma surgery and questionnaire completion was 12.3 years. Forty-one percent of the patients practiced CI. The median quality of life score was significantly higher for the patients practicing the CI: (69.26 vs 58.33, P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the risk factors for not performing CI were age, obesity, the presence of colostomy for less than six years, and a non-oncologic indication for operation.
Conclusions: CI appeared to improve the quality of life of patients with colostomy. This care is a therapeutic education issue and should be proposed to all patients. Supervision by the enterostomal therapy nurse is recommended especially for patients with a high risk of failure.
Keywords: Colonic irrigation; Quality of life; Stoma; Stoma-QOL.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.