Total Resection of Infected Peripheral Hemodialysis Grafts Has a Favorable Impact on Outcomes

Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Feb:71:200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.07.027. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

Abstract

Background: Surgical resection could be an eradication treatment for patients with infected hemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of 3 surgical methods, including total resection, subtotal resection, and revision.

Methods: The patients who underwent surgical excision of infected AVGs performed at a single center from August 2012 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The following 3 surgical methods were used in our study: revision, subtotal resection, and total resection. Patients' demographics, medical history, perioperative details, reconstruction time, and follow-up data were collected. The outcomes including perioperative complications (within 30 days), mortality, reinfection rate of AVGs, with new access reconstruction or not, and the outcomes between reconstruction and nonreconstruction in the follow-up period were evaluated.

Results: Forty-one patients had infected AVGs in our study. Patients' mean age was 62 years, and 65.9% of the patients were female. The mean duration from the time of diagnosis to the operation was 14.4 days. Signs and symptoms at presentation included fever (51.2 %), swelling (43.9%), pain (58.5%), erythematous change (92.7%), and more severe features, such as altered consciousness (14.6%) and hypotension (12.2%). The pathological changes in the infected grafts included bleeding (29.3%), pus formation (73.2%), pseudoaneurysm (26.8%), and graft exposure (17.1%). Wound and graft cultures revealed an infectious etiology with fungi (7.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.2%), Enterococcus spp. (2.4%), and Staphylococcus spp. (58.5%), with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus accounting for only 7.3%. Total resection, subtotal resection, and revision surgery were performed in 17.1%, 63.4%, and 19.5% of patients, respectively. Seven patients with complications required reoperation (17.1%), and adhesion ileus and hospital-acquired pneumonia occurred in only 2.4% and 7.3% of patients, respectively. During follow-up, most patients (82.9%) had reconstruction of the peripheral hemodialysis access with mean time of 64.3 (range: 21-92) days; mean time of use of new access was 90.5 days; and mean time of removal of catheter was about 106.3 days. Mortality rates in patients without and with reconstructed AV access during follow-up were 50% and 18%, respectively (P < 0.004). Eight cases (19.5%) had recurrence of AV access infections during follow-up; of these, 2 had revision surgery and 6 had subtotal resection. However, no patient with total resection had recurrent infections.

Conclusions: The total resection group had no recurrent infection compared to the subtotal and revision groups. In addition, patients with reconstruction of peripheral hemodialysis access had a low mortality rate during the follow-up period.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / adverse effects*
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / instrumentation
  • Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical / mortality
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis / adverse effects*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects*
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / instrumentation
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Device Removal* / adverse effects
  • Device Removal* / mortality
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / diagnosis
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / microbiology
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / mortality
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections / surgery*
  • Recurrence
  • Renal Dialysis*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome