Emotion Regulation as a Time-Invariant and Time-Varying Covariate Predicts Outcome in an Internet-Based Psychodynamic Treatment Targeting Adolescent Depression

Jakob Mechler; Karin Lindqvist; Fredrik Falkenström; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson; Björn Philips

doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00671

Emotion Regulation as a Time-Invariant and Time-Varying Covariate Predicts Outcome in an Internet-Based Psychodynamic Treatment Targeting Adolescent Depression

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 14:11:671. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00671. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Jakob Mechler¹, Karin Lindqvist¹, Fredrik Falkenström², Per Carlbring¹, Gerhard Andersson^{2

3}, Björn Philips¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
² Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
³ Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Objective: Although psychodynamic psychotherapy is efficacious in the treatment of depression, research on mechanisms of change is still scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate if and how emotion regulation affects outcome both as a time-invariant and a lagged time-varying predictor.

Method: The sample consisted of 67 adolescents diagnosed with major depressive disorder, attending affect-focused psychodynamic internet-based treatment (IPDT). Linear mixed models were used to analyze emotion regulation as a baseline predictor and to assess the effect of within-person changes in emotion regulation on depression.

Results: Analyses suggested that emotion regulation at baseline was a significant predictor of outcome, where participants with relatively larger emotion regulation deficits gained more from IPDT. Further, the results showed a significant effect of improved emotion regulation on subsequent depressive symptomatology. When not controlling for time, increased emotion regulation explained 41.23% of the variance in subsequent symptoms of depression. When detrending the results were still significant, but the amount of explained variance was reduced to 8.7%.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that patients with relatively larger deficits in emotion regulation gain more from IPDT. Decreased emotion regulation deficits seem to act as a mechanism of change in IPDT as it drives subsequent changes in depression.Clinical Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 16206254, https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN16206254.

Keywords: adolescents; depression; emotion regulation; internet-based treatment; mechanism of change; psychodynamic; psychotherapy process.