Background: Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) are currently recommended for liver transplant candidates. We hypothesized that PFTs may not provide added clinical value to the evaluation of liver transplant patients.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult cadaveric liver transplants from 2012 to 2018. Abnormal PFTs were defined as restrictive disease of diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) <80% or obstructive disease of ratio of forced expiratory volume in the first 1 second to the first vital capacity of the lungs (FEV1/FVC) <70%.
Results: We analyzed data on 415 liver transplant patients (358 abnormal PFT results and 57 normal results). The liver transplant patients with abnormal PFTs had no difference in number of intensive care unit (ICU) days (P = .68), length of stay (P = .24), or intubation days (P = .33). There were no differences in pulmonary complications including pleural effusion (P = .30), hemo/pneumothorax (P = .74), pneumonia (P = .66), acute respiratory distress syndrome (P = .57), or pulmonary edema (P = .73). The significant finding between groups was a higher rate of reintubation in liver transplant patients with normal PFTs (P = .02). There was no difference in graft survival (P = .53) or patient survival (P = .42).
Discussion: Abnormal PFTs, found in 86% of liver transplant patients, did not correlate with complications, graft failure, or mortality. PFTs contribute to the high cost of liver transplants but do not help predict which patients are at risk of postoperative complications.
Keywords: liver transplant; outcomes; pulmonary function tests.