Leprosy post-exposure prophylaxis in the Indian health system: A cost-effectiveness analysis

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Aug 4;14(8):e0008521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008521. eCollection 2020 Aug.

Abstract

India has the highest burden of leprosy in the world. Following a recent WHO guideline, the Indian National Leprosy Programme is introducing post-exposure prophylaxis with single-dose rifampicin (SDR-PEP) in all high-endemic districts of the country. The aim of this study is to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of SDR-PEP in different leprosy disability burden situations. We used a stochastic individual-based model (SIMCOLEP) to simulate the leprosy new case detection rate trend and the impact of implementing contact screening and SDR-PEP from 2016 to 2040 (25 years) in the Union Territory of Dadra Nagar Haveli (DNH) in India. Effects of the intervention were expressed as disability adjusted life years (DALY) averted under three assumption of disability prevention: 1) all grade 1 disability (G1D) cases prevented; 2) G1D cases prevented in PB cases only; 3) no disability prevented. Costs were US$ 2.9 per contact. Costs and effects were discounted at 3%. The incremental cost per DALY averted by SDR-PEP was US$ 210, US$ 447, and US$ 5,673 in the 25th year under assumption 1, 2, and 3, respectively. If prevention of G1D was assumed, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 1.0 at the threshold of US$ 2,000, which is equivalent to the GDP per capita of India. The probability of cost-effectiveness was 0.6, if no disability prevention was assumed. The cost per new leprosy case averted was US$ 2,873. Contact listing, screening and the provision of SDR-PEP is a cost-effective strategy in leprosy control in both the short (5 years) and long term (25 years). The cost-effectiveness depends on the extent to which disability can be prevented. As the intervention becomes increasingly cost-effective in the long term, we recommend a long-term commitment for its implementation.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chemoprevention / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Government Programs*
  • Humans
  • India
  • Leprostatic Agents / economics
  • Leprostatic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Leprosy / diagnosis
  • Leprosy / drug therapy*
  • Leprosy / economics
  • Leprosy / prevention & control*
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis / economics*
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis / methods
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Rifampin / economics
  • Rifampin / therapeutic use

Substances

  • Leprostatic Agents
  • Rifampin

Grants and funding

The study was funded by the Novartis Foundation, Basel, Switzerland (https://www.novartisfoundation.org/our-work/accelerating-leprosy-elimination/leprosy-post-exposure-prophylaxis-lpep-program). The grant was received by JHR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.