Objective: This study aims to analyze and compare the diagnostic effectiveness of 320-row multi-detector computed tomography for coronary artery angiography (MDCTA) in subjects with and without sublingual vasodilator (nitroglycerin).
Materials and methods: From September 2015 to September 2016, 70 individuals without history of major cardiovascular diseases who underwent MDCTA for health examination were retrospectively categorized into sublingual nitroglycerin (NTG) and non-NTG groups. Medical history, CT dose index (CTDI), and multi-slice CT images were compared between two groups. A diameter of coronary artery (DA, mm) was computed and analyzed.
Results: A total of 41 males and 29 females (mean age: 55.43±8.84 years, range: 34- 76) were reviewed. Normal and abnormal MDCTA findings were noted in 54 and 16 participants, respectively, with the detection rate of coronary artery disease being 23%. There was no significant difference in inter-observer variability of coronary CTA image quality and diagnosis between the NTG and non-NTG groups among three experienced radiologists. Although the percentage dilatation of left anterior descending branch (LAD), right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex branch (LCX) following in the NTG group were 12.4%, 12.8% and 25.3%, respectively (p < 0.01), there was no significant difference in image quality and diagnosis between the two groups.
Conclusions: Despite the recommendation of routine nitroglycerin use for subjects undergoing computed tomography for coronary artery angiography, our results showed no significant advantage of its use in improving image quality and rate of diagnosis accuracy.
Keywords: Multi-detector computed tomography for coronary artery angiography (MDCTA); coronary artery disease; nitroglycerin.