Mitochondrial metabolic genes provide phylogeographic relationships of global collections of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 28;15(7):e0235430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235430. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Phylogeographic relationships among global collections of the mosquito Aedes aegypti were evaluated using the mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase 1 (CO1) and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4 (ND4) genes including new sequences from Sri Lanka. Phylogeographic analysis estimated that Ae. aegypti arose as a species ~614 thousand years ago (kya) in the late Pleistocene. At 545 kya an "early" East African clade arose that continued to differentiate in East Africa, and eventually gave rise to three lineages one of which is distributed throughout all tropical and subtropical regions, a second that contains Southeast Asian/Sri Lankan mosquitoes and a third that contains mostly New World mosquitoes. West African collections were not represented in this early clade. The late clade continued to differentiate throughout Africa and gave rise to a lineage that spread globally. The most recent branches of the late clade are represented by South-East Asia and India/Pakistan collections. Analysis of migration rates suggests abundant gene flow between India/Pakistan and the rest of the world with the exception of Africa.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aedes / classification
  • Aedes / genetics*
  • Africa
  • Africa, Eastern
  • Animals
  • DNA, Mitochondrial / genetics*
  • Electron Transport Complex IV / genetics
  • Gene Flow
  • Genes, Mitochondrial / genetics
  • Haplotypes
  • India
  • Mitochondria / genetics*
  • Mitochondria / metabolism
  • Pakistan
  • Phylogeny
  • Phylogeography*
  • Sri Lanka

Substances

  • DNA, Mitochondrial
  • Electron Transport Complex IV

Grants and funding

This research was funded by World Class University Project, University of Sri Jayewardenepura (https://www.sjp.ac.lk/wcup/), grant number [WCUP/PhD/17/2012]. B.G.D.N.K. De Silva received the funding. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.