The potential benefit of a second C-reactive protein measurement in patients with gram-negative bacteraemia presenting to the emergency medicine department

Biomarkers. 2020 Nov;25(7):533-538. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2020.1797878. Epub 2020 Jul 26.

Abstract

Background: Low C-reactive protein in acute bacterial infections could convey the erroneous impression of a mild infection. We focussed on gram-negative bacteraemia, a phenomenon frequently seen at the emergency room.

Methods: Of 2200 patients with gram-negative bacteraemia, 460 patients with first C-reactive protein <30 mg/L and 460 patients with C-reactive protein >187 mg/L were reviewed. Following exclusions, we finally investigated 229 and 289 patients with low and high C-reactive protein concentrations, respectively.

Results: The cohort was divided into low and high C-reactive protein groups. Median first C-reactive protein was 13.6 and 219.9 mg/L, respectively (interquartile range 6.4-21.6 and 195-270.1). Compared to patients with first high C-reactive protein, patients with first low C-reactive protein concentrations had a significant five-fold higher C-reactive protein level with their second test.

Conclusions: Patients with gram-negative bacteraemia can present with C-reactive protein within the range of apparently healthy individuals. A second C-reactive protein might help to avoid an erroneous decision regarding the severity of the infection.

Keywords: C-reactive protein; cytokines; department of emergency medicine; gram-negative bacteraemia; inflammation.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Bacteremia / diagnosis*
  • Bacteremia / genetics
  • Bacteremia / microbiology
  • Bacteremia / pathology
  • C-Reactive Protein / genetics*
  • Emergency Medicine*
  • Emergency Service, Hospital
  • Female
  • Gram-Negative Bacteria / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • C-Reactive Protein