Analysis of the Static and Dynamic Imbibition Effect of Surfactants and the Relative Mechanism in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

ACS Omega. 2020 Jul 10;5(28):17442-17449. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c01888. eCollection 2020 Jul 21.

Abstract

Establishing an effective displacement system for conventional water flooding development in low-permeability reservoirs is difficult, with generally low liquid and oil production and a worse water flooding effect. Imbibition oil recovery technology has received increasing attention from oil development workers because of its simple operation, low cost, and good oil increase effect. To explore the method and mechanism to further improve the effect of imbibition oil recovery, we study the imbibition and oil recovery effect and its influencing factors in a low-permeability reservoir in the Dagang Oilfield based on evaluation indexes of the adhesion work reduction factor, ratio of capillary force to gravity N B -1, regression analysis of the recovery rate of imbibition, proportional relationship with spontaneous imbibition, and dynamic imbibition effect in crack rocks. Results show that reducing the interfacial tension of the surfactant on the imbibition process has a dual effect. The selection of the surfactant for fractured tight reservoirs should not excessively pursue ultralow interfacial tension, and it should consider the surface wettability environment favorable for imbibition to ensure that a sufficient driving force can be provided. In the initial imbibition stage, the capillary force is large, the velocity of water imbibition in pores is fast, and the oil recovery rate is high; the holding time of the imbibition process is important to imbibition recovery. With the increase in imbibition time, the capillary force weakens, and the imbibition speed decreases to zero. With the increase in injection volume, reservoir pressure, pressure holding time, and imbibition cycles, the oil recovery increases, but the amplification of oil recovery decreases. From the technical and economic viewpoints, the optimal slug size, throughput cycle, and pressure holding time of the target reservoir are recommended as follows: 0.5 PV,three3 rounds, and greater than 96 h, respectively.