Explication of the roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) as diagnostic and predictor tools for prostate cancer in equivocal PSA range of 4-10 ng/mL

Saudi J Biol Sci. 2020 Aug;27(8):1975-1984. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Apr 10.

Abstract

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most commonly encountered cancers and the leading cause of death worldwide. Currently used biomarkers accounts difficulties in discriminating benign from malignant cases or predicting outcome, so investigating new biomarkers performance is needed.

Objectives: Assessment of diagnostic and predictor roles of prostate health index (PHI) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) in PCa.

Methods: 194 males with initial tPSA of 4-10 ng/mL were categorized into three groups: PCa, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and healthy control. Serum levels of tPSA, fPSA, p2PSA, and uPA were performed by ELISA with calculation of PHI as (p2PSA/fPSA) × √PSA.

Results: PHI and uPA were significantly higher in PCa patients relevant to BPH and healthy control (p ≤ 0.001). Both markers outperformed all assessed biomarkers and showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) in ROC curve analysis. Both were significantly higher in PCa patients with {Gleason score ≥ 7, late stages (cT2b,c; T3), LN extension and distant metastasis}relative to their counterparts. Additionally, PHI and uPA and were independent predictors of distant metastasis and Gleason score ≥ 7, while PHI was predictor of LN invasion (β = 0.25, p = 0.004).

Conclusion: PHI and uPA would be of potential value in discriminating between PCa, BPH and healthy men in addition, both are promising as independent predictors of adverse pathological features.

Keywords: Prostate cancer -Urokinase plasminogen activator- prostate health index- Gleason score.