Maintenance energy requirements and forage intake of purebred vs. crossbred beef cows

Claire E Andresen; Aksel W Wiseman; Adam McGee; Carla Goad; Andrew P Foote; Ryan Reuter; David L Lalman

doi:10.1093/tas/txaa008

Maintenance energy requirements and forage intake of purebred vs. crossbred beef cows

Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Jan 19;4(2):txaa008. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa008. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Authors

Claire E Andresen¹, Aksel W Wiseman^{1

1}, Adam McGee^{1

1}, Carla Goad², Andrew P Foote¹, Ryan Reuter¹, David L Lalman¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.
² Department of Statistics, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the impacts of cow breed type and age on maintenance requirements, feed energy utilization, and voluntary forage intake. The main effect of breed type included Angus (ANG; n = 32) and Hereford × Angus (HA; n = 27) lactating cows. The main effect of age included 2- and 3-yr-old (YOUNG; n = 29) and 4- to 8-yr-old (MATURE; n = 30) cows. Within breed type and age class, cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 pens for a total of 8 pens, each housing 7 to 9 cow/calf pairs. To determine maintenance energy requirements, cows and calves were limit-fed for 105 d to body weight (BW) and body condition score (BCS) stasis. There were no differences between breeds in cow hip height, BW, average milk yield (P > 0.31), diet digestibility, or cow maintenance energy requirement (P = 0.54). Crossbred cows had greater BCS (P < 0.05) throughout the experiment. Efficiency of calf growth was not different between breeds when expressed as feed intake of the cow/calf pair nor as energy intake of the pair per unit of calf BW gain (P ≥ 0.31). Young cows produced less milk per day and per unit of BW^0.75 (P < 0.01); however, there was no effect of cow age on maintenance energy requirement, diet digestibility, or efficiency of calf growth (P > 0.10). Subsequently, a 45-d experiment was conducted to determine voluntary low-quality forage intake. Cows were housed in dry-lot pens equipped with shade, windbreaks, and feed bunks with free-choice access to clean water and a chopped hay ration was provided ad libitum to determine forage intake. Daily forage intake was lower (P = 0.05) for HA compared with ANG (123 vs. 132 g/kg BW^0.75, respectively) although there was no difference in BW. However, HA cows sustained greater BCS (P < 0.01). There was no difference (P = 0.60) in forage intake per unit of BW^0.75 due to cow age. Results indicate similar calf growth efficiency among breed types although crossbred cows maintained greater body energy stores and consumed less low-quality forage during the voluntary intake experiment. These differences could not be attributed to lower maintenance energy requirements. Neither maintenance energy requirement nor calf growth efficiency was different between young and mature cows.

Keywords: body composition; cow efficiency; feed intake; maintenance; milk yield.