Diet formulation method influences the response to increasing net energy in finishing pigs

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to compare the effects of increasing dietary net energy (NE) in finishing pig diets while either maintaining a standardized ileal digestible lysine:NE ratio (SID Lys:NE) or maintaining SID Lys as a constant percentage of the diet across increasing energy densities. A total of 150 pigs (Line 600 × 241; DNA, Columbus, NE; initially 35.7 kg) were used in a 91-d study. Pigs were blocked by sex and weight and randomly assigned to 1 of 5 treatments with 2 pigs per pen and 15 pens per treatment. Treatments included a low-energy control diet that was corn-soybean meal-based with added soybean hulls, and a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments with main effects of increasing dietary NE (medium or high by adding choice white grease) and formulation method (with a SID Lys:NE ratio or maintaining the same percentage SID Lys). Linear and quadratic contrasts were made using the control diet and the medium- and high-energy diets within each formulation method. Pigs and feeders were weighed approximately every 30 d to calculate average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake (ADFI), and gain-to-feed ratio (G:F). At the end of the experiment, pigs were sent to a commercial processing facility for carcass data collection. From days 0 to 34 and 34 to 61, ADG and SID Lys intake increased as NE increased (linear, P < 0.05) in pigs fed diets with a Lys:NE ratio, but not for those fed the same percentage Lys. As NE increased, NE intake and G:F increased (P < 0.01) in pigs fed diets with either formulation method. From days 61 to 91, increasing NE had no effect (P > 0.10) on ADG. There was no change in G:F in pigs fed diets with the same percentage Lys (P > 0.10), but G:F decreased then increased (quadratic, P < 0.01) in response to increasing NE in pigs fed diets with a SID Lys:NE ratio. Overall, increasing dietary NE increased (linear, P < 0.001) daily NE intake and G:F (linear, P < 0.018) with either formulation method. However, SID Lys intake, ADG, and hot carcass weight only increased (linear, P < 0.01) when a SID Lys:NE ratio was maintained. Increasing NE without maintaining a constant SID Lys:NE ratio increased backfat depth (quadratic, P = 0.01), whereas it did not in pigs fed diets with a SID Lys:NE ratio. In conclusion, increasing dietary energy density increased NE intake and G:F regardless of formulation method. However, a SID Lys:NE ratio must be maintained to achieve increased ADG and minimize fat deposition.

Keywords: Lys:NE ratio; growing-finishing pig; lysine; net energy.