Usefulness of a Novel Electrocardiographic Score to Estimate the Pre-Test Probability of Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1:130:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.05.042. Epub 2020 Jun 7.

Abstract

According to our experience the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) may be used to estimate the pretest probability of acute pulmonary embolism (acPE). To this end, we devised a novel ECG score (nECGs) composed of 5 known ECG criteria, best characterizing the key pathogenetic steps of acPE. A retrospective derivation cohort including 136 patients with acPE and a prospective validation cohort including 149 consecutive patients were used to devise and validate the nECGs. The latter cohort consisted of 76 patients with acPE and 73 controls presenting with characteristic symptoms of acPE, in whom the work-up ruled out acPE. We compared the diagnostic value of our nECGs with those of another ECG score (Daniel-ECG-score) and of the best prediction rules (3 Wells score and 2 Geneva score variants). The sensitivity (98.7%), negative predictive value (98%), test accuracy (84.4%) and the negative likelihood ratio (LR) (0.019) of the nECGs were superior to those of all other investigated methods. There was no between-groups difference in the positive LR. The specificity (69%) of the nECGs was inferior to those of the Daniel-ECG-score and Wells scores and did not differ or was superior to those of the Geneva score variants. The positive predictive value (77.3%) of the nECGs was superior to those of the 2 Geneva scores and did not differ from those of the other methods. In conclusion, the nECGs due to its superior sensitivity, negative predictive value, test accuracy, and negative LR estimated the pretest probability of acPE better than the Daniel-ECG-score and the prediction rules.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electrocardiography / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Probability
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity