Effects of different separation methods on the physical and functional properties of extracellular vesicles

PLoS One. 2020 Jul 7;15(7):e0235793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235793. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are small vesicles secreted from cells. They have crucial biological functions in intercellular communications and may even be biomarkers for cancer. The various methods used to isolate EVs from body fluid and cell culture supernatant have been compared in prior studies, which determined that the component yield and physical properties of isolated EVs depend largely on the isolation method used. Several novel and combined methods have been recently developed, which have not yet been compared to the established methods. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the physical and functional differences in EVs isolated using a differential centrifugation method, the precipitation-based Invitrogen kit, the ExoLutE kit, and the Exodisc, of which the latter two were recently developed. We investigated the properties of EVs isolated from non-infected and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus-infected human umbilical vein endothelial cells using each method and determined the yields of DNA, RNA, and proteins using quantitative polymerase chain reaction and bicinchoninic acid assays. Additionally, we determined whether the biological activity of EVs correlated with the quantity or physical properties of the EVs isolated using different methods. We found that Exodisc was the most suitable method for obtaining large quantities of EVs, which might be useful for biomarker investigations, and that the EVs separated using Exodisc exhibited the highest complement activation activity. However, we also found that the functional properties of EVs were best maintained when differential centrifugation was used. Effective isolation is necessary to study EVs as tools for diagnosing cancer and our findings may have relevant implications in the field of oncology by providing researchers with data to assist their selection of a suitable isolation method.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers / analysis
  • Cell Fractionation / methods*
  • Centrifugation / methods
  • Chemical Precipitation
  • DNA / analysis
  • Endothelial Cells / chemistry*
  • Endothelial Cells / virology
  • Extracellular Vesicles / chemistry*
  • Extracellular Vesicles / virology
  • Herpesviridae Infections / virology
  • Herpesvirus 8, Human / isolation & purification
  • Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
  • Humans
  • Proteins / analysis
  • RNA / analysis

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Proteins
  • RNA
  • DNA

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the Mid-Career Researcher Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (KNRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2019R1A2C2083947, NRF-2017R1A2B4002405) to MSL. NO