Biomedical research models in the science of fracture healing - Pitfalls & promises

Injury. 2020 Oct;51(10):2118-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.025. Epub 2020 Jun 15.

Abstract

Development of intervention strategies to stimulate fracture healing has long been a focus of musculoskeletal research. Considerable investment in empirical research has led to the discovery of several genes and signaling pathways that are involved in skeletal development and regeneration. However, there are currently very few biologic interventions that can efficiently be used to enhance fracture healing in clinical practice. This translational barrier is due in part to experimental barriers to mechanism discovery. Animal models, biomechanical models, finite element models, and mathematical models are a few examples of models that aid in the discovery of mechanisms. Understanding the advantages, limitations, and specialized uses of each model type is critical to our ability to interpret mechanistic insights from such research and to help bridge the translation gap between pre-clinical research and clinical practice. In this review, we look at specific modeling methods used in the study of the fracture healing mechanism. We also discuss the strength and limitations to translation of each method, hopefully leading to a better understanding of how we can use models to advance the study of fracture healing.

Keywords: Animal models; Computer simulation; Data driven models; Finite element models; Fracture healing; Mathematical models; Mechanism discovery; Modeling.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Biomedical Research*
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Fracture Healing*
  • Models, Animal
  • Models, Biological
  • Models, Theoretical