Correlation between mechanical properties and stabilization time of chemical bonds in glass-ionomer cements

Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jun 5:34:e053. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0053. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate the compressive strength (CS), diametral tensile strength (DTS), flexural strength (FS), and Knoop microhardness (KH) of different conventional restorative glass-ionomer cements (GICs) and to correlate these mechanical properties (MP) with the stabilization time (ST) of their chemical bonds. Eighteen GICs were tested: Bioglass [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z[ IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [Ma], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. The mechanical strength tests were performed in a universal testing machine. KH readings were done with a diamond indenter. STs were examined by Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Data were analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey test (p<0.05). The Spearman rank test was used to evaluate the dependence between the MPs and ST results. The highest MP values were EF, GL2, GL9, GI and KM and the lowest for MG, MA, B, VF and IM. The longest ST was for GL2 and the shortest was for B. ST correlated positively with MP. GICs with longer chemical bonds ST are generally stronger and the ST value obtained from FTIR was useful in predicting the strength of GICs tested.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Analysis of Variance
  • Compressive Strength
  • Flexural Strength
  • Glass Ionomer Cements / chemistry*
  • Hardness Tests
  • Materials Testing
  • Reference Values
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self-Curing of Dental Resins / methods*
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
  • Tensile Strength
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Glass Ionomer Cements