There is no consensus regarding the use of systemic heparin, and long-term outcomes of living donor hepatectomy (LDH) without systemic heparinization have not yet been determined. This study was performed to determine whether systemic heparinization can be omitted during LDH, with a focus on donor safety and long-term outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of 175 cases of LDH performed in our institution between January 2011 and December 2014: group I (n = 79) received systemic heparinization, whereas group II (n = 96) did not, but liver graft was flushed with a heparinized perfusate. Postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion or intervention was more frequent in group I than in group II (P = .028). The decreases in donor hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, and platelet count during the early postoperative period, were greater in group I than in group II. In multivariate analysis, systemic heparin was the only independent risk factor for blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] = 5.114; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.201-21.775; P = .027) and significant postoperative bleeding (OR = 7.731; 95% CI: 1.345-44.429; P = .022) after LDH. Most postoperative complications including graft vascular thrombosis were similar between the 2 groups, as was the survival rate, and neither graft loss due to vascular thrombosis nor non-anastomotic biliary stricture was evident. In conclusion, omission of systemic heparinization during LDH is a feasible and safe option without adverse effects.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.