Background: The optimal treatment for lacrimal gland cancer remains unclear. Eye-preserving surgery, as opposed to exenteration, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (RT), has recently been reported to deliver satisfactory outcomes, but evidence is sparse. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with lacrimal gland cancer treated at two tertiary medical centers.
Methods: We retrospectively examined data from patients with lacrimal gland cancer who had received eye-preserving surgical treatment followed by adjuvant RT with or without chemotherapy, or (if the tumor was inoperable) needle biopsy with definitive RT with or without chemotherapy. Baseline clinical and pathological characteristics were considered. Outcomes of interest included post-treatment complications, overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LPFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS).
Results: Eighteen patients were included. Two-year OS, LPFS, and DMFS rates were 69.0, 76.7, and 71.4%, respectively. Patients with early-stage (T1-T2) lacrimal gland cancer had significantly better outcomes than those with advanced-stage disease (T3-T4). Two-year OS, LPFS, and DMFS rates were each 100% in patients with disease stages T1-T2, and 37.5, 50, and 37.5%, respectively, in those with disease stages T3-T4 (P < 0.05). Orbital complications were well tolerated.
Conclusions: Eye-sparing surgery with adjuvant RT can achieve satisfactory results in patients with T1-T2 lacrimal gland carcinoma. Disease stage T3 and above was associated with poor outcomes even with post-operative RT, likely due to distant metastasis. Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy to current treatment strategies might be a suitable choice for this group of patients.
Keywords: Lacrimal gland carcinoma; Orbital exenteration; Orbital tumors; Radiotherapy.