Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery

Monika Raulinajtys-Grzybek; Iwona Grabska-Liberek; Aleksandra Opala; Marta Słomka; Michał Chrobot

doi:10.1186/s12962-020-00214-y

Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery

Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Jun 16:18:19. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00214-y. eCollection 2020.

Authors

Monika Raulinajtys-Grzybek¹, Iwona Grabska-Liberek², Aleksandra Opala², Marta Słomka³, Michał Chrobot⁴

Affiliations

¹ Department of Management Accounting, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland.
² Department of Ophthalmology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
³ Department of Neurochemistry, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
⁴ Polish Association of Medical Coders, Kielce, Poland.

Abstract

Background: Over 300,000 cataract operations are performed in Poland every year, and the most common, late complication of cataract removal surgery is posterior capsule opacification (PCO). The risk of PCO depends on the lens material. Hydrophobic acrylic lenses cause PCO less frequently as lymphatic endothelial cells show lower affinity for the surface of the lens made of silicone. The objective of this study is to assess the economic impact of using hydrophobic acrylic lenses compared to using hydrophilic acrylic lenses for cataract treatment in the Polish inpatient and outpatient settings.

Methods: A budget impact analysis (BIA) compared the economic outcomes associated with using hydrophobic acrylic lenses versus using hydrophilic lenses for patients undergoing cataract surgery. The BIA predicted annual expenses in the following scenarios: performing Nd:YAG to treat PCO within 2 and 3 years after implantation of hydrophobic or hydrophilic acrylic lenses for different lens structure. Data used to assess the frequency of PCO was determined in systematic literature review. Costs of current and predicted interventions were estimated based on average data from 19 Polish hospitals. Prices of health services were taken from official public tariff lists.

Results: The use of a hydrophobic lens significantly limits the number of complications after cataract surgery relative to a hydrophilic lens. As hydrophobic lenses have a higher unit price their use increases the cost of treatment which currently is not reflected by adequate difference in price of the service. Total annual National Health Fund (NHF) expenses for 3-year follow-up model range from 139.1 million EUR to 143.1 million EUR depending on the lens structure, due to the cost of complications.

Conclusions: BIA indicates the possibility of introducing surcharge for the use of hydrophobic lenses, which could increase the frequency of their use and reduce the number of complications after cataract surgery. It was estimated that total NHF expenses reach the minimum value for the surcharge at the level of 9 EUR. The surcharge of 14 EUR is the maximum value that does not increase the initial NHF expenses.

Keywords: Budget impact analysis; Hydrophilic acrylic lenses; Hydrophobic acrylic lenses; Posterior capsule opacification.