The Role of Performance Status in Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Clin Lung Cancer. 2020 Nov;21(6):e539-e543. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Abstract

After decades of platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced small-cell lung cancer, there has finally been a therapeutic advance. The combination of a platinum chemotherapy, etoposide, and an immune checkpoint inhibitor has yielded overall survival benefits in two successive phase 3 trials. Unfortunately, these trials only included fit patients, namely those with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1. In the real-world setting, roughly a third of patients with advanced small-cell lung cancer has a performance status of 2, and an additional 15% have a performance status of 3 or 4, meaning that approximately half of all patients are excluded from chemoimmunotherapy trials. Poor performance status is a known negative prognostic factor, with a dismal prognosis among patients with disease that does not respond to the first cycle of chemotherapy.We review current data on immunotherapy in advanced small-cell lung cancer and discuss how we integrate the new therapeutic options into daily practice.

Keywords: Chemoimmunotherapy; Immunotherapy; PS2; Performance status; SCLC.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Immunotherapy / methods*
  • Lung Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Lung Neoplasms / immunology
  • Lung Neoplasms / pathology
  • Prognosis
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / drug therapy*
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / immunology
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma / pathology

Substances

  • Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors