Levels of support for the licensing of tobacco retailers in Australia: findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2004-2016

John Baker; Mohd Masood; Muhammad Aziz Rahman; Stephen Begg

doi:10.1186/s12889-020-08920-1

Levels of support for the licensing of tobacco retailers in Australia: findings from the National Drug Strategy Household Survey 2004-2016

BMC Public Health. 2020 May 24;20(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08920-1.

Authors

John Baker¹, Mohd Masood², Muhammad Aziz Rahman^{3

4}, Stephen Begg⁵

Affiliations

¹ Rural Department of Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, P.O Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia. J.Baker@latrobe.edu.au.
² Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
³ School of Nursing and Healthcare Professions, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC, Australia.
⁴ School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
⁵ Rural Department of Community Health, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, P.O Box 199, Bendigo, VIC, 3552, Australia.

Abstract

Background: Assessing public opinion towards tobacco policies is important, particularly when determining the possible direction of future public health policies. The aim of this study was to describe the implementation of tobacco retailer licensing systems by state and territory governments in Australia, and to use the National Drug Strategy Household Survey (NDSHS) to assess levels of public support for a retailer licensing system in each jurisdiction over time and by a range of socio-demographic and behavioural attributes.

Methods: National and state/territory estimates of public support for a tobacco retailer licensing system were derived as proportions using NDSHS data from 2004 to 2016. The effect of one's jurisdiction of residence on the likelihood of supporting such an initiative in 2016 was assessed using logistic regression while controlling for various socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics.

Results: Public support for a tobacco retailer licensing system ranged from a high of 67.2% (95% CI 66.5-67.9%) nationally in 2007 and declined to 59.5% (95% CI 58.9-60.2%) in 2016. In 2016, support was greatest amongst those from Tasmania, those aged 50 years and older, females, those from the least disadvantaged areas, those living in major cities, never-smokers and never-drinkers. After adjusting for the socio-demographic and behavioural attributes of respondents, those from Queensland were significantly less likely to support a licensing system (adjusted OR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.77-0.94) compared to those from other jurisdictions, while those from Tasmania were significantly more likely to support a licensing system compared to those from other jurisdictions (adjusted OR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.09-1.52).

Conclusions: A clear majority of the public support a tobacco retailer licensing system, regardless of whether or not such a system is already in place in their jurisdiction of residence. Tobacco control initiatives other than a retailer licensing system may explain some of the residual variations in support observed between jurisdictions.

Keywords: Licensing; National drug strategy household survey; Public opinion; Retail; Tobacco; Tobacco policy.

MeSH terms

Adult
Aged
Australia
Commerce / legislation & jurisprudence*
Female
Humans
Licensure / legislation & jurisprudence*
Male
Middle Aged
Public Opinion*
Public Policy
Queensland
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tasmania
Tobacco Industry / legislation & jurisprudence*
Tobacco Products / legislation & jurisprudence*