Adaptations to strength training differ between endurance-trained and untrained women

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Jul;120(7):1541-1549. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04381-x. Epub 2020 May 5.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate if endurance athletes, sustaining their normal endurance training, experience attenuated adaptations to strength training compared to untrained individuals.

Methods: Eleven non-strength-trained female endurance athletes (E + S) added 11 weeks of strength training to their normal endurance training (5.1 ± 1.1 h per week), and 10 untrained women (S) performed the same strength training without any endurance training. The strength training consisted of four leg exercises [3 × 4 - 10 repetition maximum (RM)], performed twice a week for 11 weeks.

Results: E + S and S displayed similar increases in 1RM one-legged leg press (E + S 39 ± 19%, S 42 ± 17%, p < 0.05), maximal isometric torque in knee extension (E + S 12 ± 11%, S 8 ± 10%, p < 0.05) and lean mass in the legs (E + S 3 ± 4%, S 3 ± 3%, p < 0.05). However, S displayed superior increases in peak torque in knee extension at an angular velocity of 240° sec-1 (E + S 8 ± 5%, S 15 ± 7%, p < 0.05) and maximal squat jump height (E + S 8 ± 6%, S 14 ± 7%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: In this study, concurrent training did not impair the adaptations in the ability to develop force at low contraction velocities or muscle hypertrophy. However, concurrent training attenuated strength training-associated changes in the ability to develop force at higher muscular contraction velocities.

Keywords: Concurrent training; Counter movement jump; Muscle hypertrophy; Muscle strength; Squat jump.

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Physiological / physiology*
  • Adult
  • Athletes
  • Endurance Training
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Muscle Contraction / physiology*
  • Muscle Strength / physiology
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology
  • Physical Endurance / physiology*
  • Resistance Training*
  • Weight Lifting / physiology