Robotic versus open primary ventral hernia repair: A randomized controlled trial (Robovent Trial)

Int J Surg Protoc. 2020 Apr 4:21:27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.isjp.2020.03.004. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Background: The objective of the present study is to compare the outcomes open PVHR and robotic PVHR.

Methods/design: The present study will be a randomized single-blinded controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis comparing robotic PVHR to open PVHR in adult patients undergoing elective PVHR with a defect ranging between 1-5 cm. Patient refusing to participate, not able to give informed consent, with history of intra-abdominal surgery contraindicating a robotic surgical approach will be excluded. The intervention will consist in laparoscopic robotically assisted trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal epigastric or umbilical PVHR with closure of fascial defect and non-adsorbable mesh reinforcement. The control will be open pre-peritoneal epigastric or umbilical hernia repair with closure of fascial defect and non-absorbable mesh reinforcement. The primary outcome will be the incidence of wound-related complication within 1 month. The secondary outcomes will be esthetic satisfaction, pain, pain-killers consumption, general complications, costs, operative time and early hernia recurrence.

Discussion: Open PVHR is potentially associated to more wound-related complications, but has the advantages of cost-effectiveness, short operative time and totally extra-peritoneal repair. Laparoscopic PVHR has lower wound-related complications but implies placing the mesh in intra-peritoneal position, requires advanced laparoscopic skills, usually does not allow the closure of the defect, and can lead to excessive pain and pain-killers consumption. Robotic PVHR uses the same laparoscopic access as laparoscopic PVHR, but thanks to the extended range of motion given by the robotic system, allows defect closure, pre-peritoneal placement of the mesh and requires less technical skills.In the present randomized controlled trial, we expect to show that robotic PVHR leads to better wound-related outcomes than open PVHR.

Trial registration: The present randomized controlled trial was registered into clinicaltrials.gov under registration number NCT04171921.

Keywords: Da Vinci; DaVinci; Epigastric hernia; Hernia repair; Laparotomy; Mesh; PVHR; Repair; Robot; Technique; Trial; Umbilical hernia; Ventral hernia.

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04171921