Effect of REDD+ projects on local livelihood assets in Keo Seima and Oddar Meanchey, Cambodia

Sereyrotha Ken; Tomoe Entani; Takuji W Tsusaka; Nophea Sasaki

doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03802

Effect of REDD+ projects on local livelihood assets in Keo Seima and Oddar Meanchey, Cambodia

Heliyon. 2020 Apr 23;6(4):e03802. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03802. eCollection 2020 Apr.

Authors

Sereyrotha Ken^{1

2}, Tomoe Entani¹, Takuji W Tsusaka³, Nophea Sasaki³

Affiliations

¹ Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo, Japan.
² Wildlife Conservation Society, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
³ Natural Resources Management, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.

Abstract

Climate-change mitigation projects are expected to improve local livelihoods in targeted areas. Several REDD+ projects aimed at reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, conserving and enhancing forest carbon stocks, and sustainably managing forests have been implemented in Cambodia but few studies have examined the effects on local livelihoods before and during project implementation. Our study applies a sustainable livelihood framework to assess the livelihood assets of local communities in the Oddar Meanchey and Keo Seima REDD+ project sites in Cambodia before and during project implementation. Five capital assets, namely natural, physical, human, financial, and social capital, are assessed and scored on a 1-to-5 Likert scale. Data analysis collected through 252 interviews in Oddar Meanchey and Keo Seima reveals a slight increase in livelihood assets in both sites from project validation to implementation. Generally, the mean scores for local livelihood assets increased from 2.81 ± 0.07 (±is followed by the standard error) and 2.66 ± 0.06 to 3.07 ± 0.09 and 3.06 ± 0.08 in Oddar Meanchey and Keo Seima, respectively. Nevertheless, natural capital assets sharply declined from 3.50 and 3.32 to 2.09 and 2.25, respectively. Respondents mainly blamed illegal logging for the decline, suggesting that strict patrolling and enforcement must be implemented. Furthermore, the scarcity of carbon-credit buyers and the projects' inability to generate carbon-based revenues has led to dissatisfaction among local communities, inducing avoidable illegal activities in pursuit of short-term benefits. A financial mechanism to ensure sufficient and sustained financial support regardless of carbon-market volatility is urgently needed.

Keywords: Agricultural policy; Agroforestry; Biodiversity; Business; Carbon credit; Ecological restoration; Economics; Ecosystem services; Financial capital; Forestry; Human capital; Human geography; Livelihood improvement; Natural capital; Natural resource management; Physical capital; REDD+; Sustainable development.