Patient satisfaction with remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices: the VALIOSA questionnaire

BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Apr 25;20(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05216-3.

Abstract

Background: Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has demonstrated substantial benefits. Treatment guidelines have therefore endorsed its use and is being increasingly adopted in the clinical setting, but the level of satisfaction they convey remains still unknown. We developed and validated a questionnaire to measure patient satisfaction with remote monitoring using Medtronic CareLink® Network and assessed its internal reliability and dimensional validity.

Methods: After a thorough literature review, cognitive debriefing of 18 patients, and an expert panel discussion, a 30-item instrument was proposed and grouped into 5 dimensions (items): 1- Information on cardiac condition (3), 2- Device convenience (3), 3- Transmission process (6), 4- Satisfaction with medical monitoring (8), and 5- General opinions (10). Correlation with the visual analog scale (VAS), overall health related quality of life (HRQoL) measured by the EuroQoL-5D accompanied by the VAS as well as with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) SF-36 were assessed. Psychometric properties, exploratory factor analysis and a second order confirmatory factor analysis (a hierarchical CFA with a general common factor explaining the relations between the first order common factors, See Figure 1) were estimated. Models were assessed based on item loading size, sign and statistical significance, and goodness-of-fit statistics.

Results: A total of 186 patients (77% male) with a mean age of 66.03 (SD = 13.94) years were assessed. 48% had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, 24% had pacemakers, and 29% had cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. An overall Cronbach's α = 0.893 was achieved, with acceptable reliabilities for isolated dimensions. Correlations with corresponding VAS scales were meaningful and significant (p < 0.01). The second order factor solution yielded good goodness-of-fit indexes (χ2/df = 1.44, CFI = 0.96, TLI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.05). Satisfaction with remote monitoring was not related to HRQoL (r < 0.05), except for the correlation between the SF-36 mental component and the information on cardiac condition dimension (r = 0.263, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The 30-item questionnaire showed good reliability and validity to assess satisfaction with remote monitoring in patients with CIEDs.

Keywords: Cardiac implantable electronic devices; Patient health questionnaire; Patient reported outcomes; Patient satisfaction; Remote monitoring.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices*
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Patient Satisfaction / statistics & numerical data*
  • Psychometrics
  • Quality of Life
  • Remote Sensing Technology*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Surveys and Questionnaires*