Comparison and evaluation of a high volume air sampling system for the collection of Clostridioides difficile endospore aerosol in health care environments

Am J Infect Control. 2020 Nov;48(11):1354-1360. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.04.014. Epub 2020 Apr 22.

Abstract

Background: Environmental contamination of patient rooms and adjacent areas with C. difficile spores is a recognized transmission risk. Previous studies have shown that spores are aerosolized during patient care. These spores can remain airborne for extended periods and may contaminate distant surfaces. High-volume air sampling equipment allows for the collection of a large volume of air and was evaluated in the collection of C. difficile aerosol.

Method: Air samplers evaluated in this research included the DFU-1000, XMX/2L-MIL, Biocapture-650, and a MB2. Aerosols of C. difficile were generated in a 5-m3 chamber and each air sampler sampled in the aerosol test chamber simultaneously with referee air samplers.

Results: The DFU-1000 achieved the highest efficiency of the 4 air samplers (P = .0145) with a mean efficiency of 38.60%. The relative efficiencies of the Biocapture-650, XMX/2L-MIL, and MB2 were 28.16%, 10.51%, and 3.05%, respectively.

Discussion/conclusions: This study demonstrated high variation based on the sampling method employed. Based on the results of these studies, high-volume air samplers may be effectively applied to sample for airborne C. difficile in health care environments. The high sampling flow rate of the DFU-1000 would allow for the complete sampling of a patient room-sized volume in less than 1 hour.

Keywords: Airborne dissemination; Chromagar; Clostridioides difficile; Culture; Environmental contamination; Filtration; Virtual impaction.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aerosols / analysis
  • Clostridioides difficile*
  • Clostridioides*
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Environmental Monitoring
  • Humans
  • Spores, Bacterial

Substances

  • Aerosols