Characterization of the hydro-geological regime of Yangtze River basin using remotely-sensed and modeled products

V G Ferreira; B Yong; M J Tourian; C E Ndehedehe; Z Shen; K Seitz; R Dannouf

doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137354

Characterization of the hydro-geological regime of Yangtze River basin using remotely-sensed and modeled products

Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20:718:137354. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137354. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Authors

V G Ferreira¹, B Yong², M J Tourian³, C E Ndehedehe⁴, Z Shen⁵, K Seitz⁶, R Dannouf⁵

Affiliations

¹ State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China. Electronic address: vagnergf@hhu.edu.cn.
² State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.
³ Institute of Geodesy, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart 70174, Germany.
⁴ Australian Rivers Institute and Griffith School of Environment & Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia.
⁵ School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.
⁶ Geodetic Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe 76128, Germany.

PMID: 32325611
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137354

Abstract

The hydrology of the Third Pole, Asia's freshwater tower, has shown considerable sensitivity to the impacts of climate change and human interventions, which affect the headwaters of many rivers that originate therein. For example, the Yangtze River has its basin (YRB) experiencing wetness of terrestrial water storage (TWS), whose rainfall seems to be the primary source as inferred from the previous studies. Consequently, it is crucial to understand the contributions of each TWS's sub-domain - i.e., groundwater (GWS); total water content (TWC) stored as soil moisture, ice/snow, and canopy; and the surface water (SWS) storages - on YRB's wetness. Hence, SWS, from altimetry and imagery satellites, and TWC, from Global Land Data Assimilation System, are inverted considering the same basis function as for TWS from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment, which account for the differences in the resolutions inherent in each product. Furthermore, a "tie-in" signal approach is used to fit the temporal patterns of GWS, TWC, and SWS to TWS (i.e., the observations). Results show improvements in the reconstructed GWS series concerning standard deviation, correlation coefficient, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 22%, 27%, and 120%, respectively, regarding the use of the TWS-budget equation. The reconstructed time series of GWS, TWC, and SWS present an increase of 1.76, 2.69, and 0.14 mm per year (mm/yr) and that YRB loses water stored at its aquifers 55% of the time (regarding 2003-2016 period) based on the quantile function of storage (QFS). The QFS's slope shows that TWS has a fast and small storage potential w.r.t. GWS since inland waters and soil moisture reflect the dryness impacting TWS first. Despite the evidence of an increase of 19.05 mm/yr in annual precipitation, which seems to explain the bulk in TWS, further investigation to characterize controls on TWS memory within YRB is still necessary.

Keywords: GRACE; Groundwater; Mascon; PCA; Quantile function of storage; Surface water.