Who Is to Blame? Children's and Adults' Moral Judgments Regarding Victim and Transgressor Negligence

Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12833. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12833.

Abstract

Research has documented that individuals consider outcomes, intentions, and transgressor negligence when making morally relevant judgments (Nobes, Panagiotaki, & Engelhardt, 2017). However, less is known about whether individuals attend to both victim and transgressor negligence in their evaluations. The current study measured 3- to 6-year-olds (N = 70), 7- to 12-year-olds (N = 54), and adults' (N = 97, ages 18-25 years) moral judgments about scenarios in which an accidental transgression occurred involving property damage or physical harm. Participants were either assigned to conditions where the victim or the transgressor was negligent. Results revealed attention to negligence among all participants across a range of different moral judgment measures (including acceptability judgments, punishment judgments, and attributions of blame), with age-related increases in attention to negligence evident. Results provide novel evidence that children and adults consider not just outcomes and intentions, but also the role of negligence in both victims and transgressors, when making social decisions.

Keywords: Development; Intention; Moral judgments; Negligence; Social-cognition.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aging / psychology*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Crime Victims / psychology*
  • Criminals / psychology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Judgment*
  • Male
  • Morals*
  • Punishment
  • Social Perception
  • Young Adult