Since Saul Kripke's influential work in the 1970s, the revisionary approach to semantic paradox-the idea that semantic paradoxes must be solved by weakening classical logic-has been increasingly popular. In this paper, we present a new revenge argument to the effect that the main revisionary approaches breed new paradoxes that they are unable to block.
Keywords: non-contractive logics; non-transitive logics; paracomplete logics; paraconsistent logics; revenge paradoxes; semantic paradoxes.
© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.