Bureaucracy and the balanced scorecard in health care settings

Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020 Apr 8;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-07-2019-0121.

Abstract

Purpose: We explore the relationship between the balanced scorecard (BSC) and neo-bureaucracy by investigating whether the operationalization of the BSC incorporates "neo-bureaucratic" ideas and whether the BSC implemented in a Portuguese Local Health Unit (LHU) demonstrates a neo-bureaucratic approach.

Design/methodology/approach: We conduct semi-structured interviews with LHU staff and analyse documents to assess whether features of bureaucratic organization were evident in the use of a BSC by the LHU.

Findings: We found nine bureaucratic features evident in the LHU's BSC. These were systematization, rationality, authority, jurisdiction, professional qualification, knowledge, discipline, transparency and accountability. The BSC used at the LHU demonstrated a neo-bureaucratic approach.

Originality/value: Our study helps to demystify bureaucracy and overcome prevailing prejudices regarding some of its principles. Health care managers should recognize and endorse neo-bureaucratic principles in developing a BSC. They should recognize the BSC as involving a neo-bureaucratic approach. The BSC is a valuable management tool that hospital managers should find useful in fostering flexibility, collaboration, innovation and adaptation - all of which should help lead to improved healthcare outcomes.

Keywords: Balanced scorecard; Bureaucracy; Health care management; Management accounting; Organizations; Portugal.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Health Services Administration*
  • Humans
  • Models, Organizational*
  • Organizational Case Studies
  • Organizational Objectives*
  • Portugal
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care / organization & administration