In highly-interactive video streaming applications such as video conferencing, tele-presence, or tele-operation, retransmission is typically not used, due to the tight deadline of the application. In such cases, the lost or erroneous data must be concealed. While various error concealment techniques exist, there is no defined rule to compare their perceived quality. In this paper, the performance of 16 existing image and video quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM, VQM, etc.) evaluating errorconcealed video quality is studied. The encoded video is subjected to packet loss and the loss is concealed using various error concealment techniques. We show that the subjective quality of the video cannot be necessarily predicted from the visual quality of the error-concealed frame alone. We then apply the metrics to the error-concealed images/videos and evaluate their success in predicting the scores reported by human subjects. The errorconcealed videos are judged by image quality metrics applied on the lossy frame, or by video quality metrics applied on the video clip containing that lossy frame; this way, the impact of error propagation is also considered by the objective metrics. The measurement and comparison of the results show that, mostly though not always, measuring the objective quality of the video is a better way to judge the error concealment performance. Moreover, our experiments show that when the objective quality metrics are used for the assessment of the performance of an error concealment technique, they do not behave as they would for general quality assessment. In fact, some newly developed metrics show the correct decision only about 60% of the time, leading to an unacceptable error rate of as much as 40%. Our analysis shows which specific quality metrics are relatively more suitable for error-concealed videos.