Three strategies for doing narrative resistance: Navigating between master narratives

Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Oct;59(4):1043-1061. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12376. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Abstract

Narrative psychology emphasizes the role of culture in shaping identities. Less attention has been paid to how individuals resist culture. Specifically, two aspects have remained understudied: the diverse forms of doing narrative resistance and the navigation between different types of master narratives involved in the process. The present study aimed to fill these gaps by examining the personal stories of former residents of Yamit, an Israeli region in the Sinai Peninsula that was evacuated following the peace agreement between Israel and Egypt. Holistic narrative analysis of the personal stories revealed three strategies of resisting the episodic master narrative of Yamit established in Israeli society - explicit debate, implicit debate, and neutralization - which differ in the relative weight of my/our story and the story about us. To remain within the Israeli consensus, resistance to the episodic master narrative was intertwined with appropriation of the Zionist foundational master narrative. The study demonstrates that narrative resistance can take diverse forms and simultaneously involve compliance with and resistance to different types of master narratives. Investigating these two findings offers a nuanced understanding of counter-narratives as multifaceted, illuminating the complex relationships between personal stories and culture.

Keywords: counter-narratives; episodic master narratives; foundational master narratives; narrative resistance.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Egypt
  • Female
  • Group Processes*
  • Humans
  • Israel
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Personal Narratives as Topic*
  • Social Identification*