Interrupted or Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Undergoing Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Jun;34(3):371-381. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06967-1.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The safety and efficacy of uninterrupted, minimally interrupted (one dose skipped) or completely interrupted (24 h skipped) oral anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation are poorly defined. We conducted a network meta-analysis to explore the effect of interrupted or uninterrupted oral anticoagulants in patients with AF undergoing ablation.

Methods: The Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for studies comparing uninterrupted, minimally interrupted or completely interrupted non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) with continuous or interrupted warfarin in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Results: Twelve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with a total of 5597 patients with AF undergoing catheter ablation were included. For thromboembolism, minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.35), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.01-0.23) and continuous VKAs (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.01-0.21) were better than interrupted warfarin. The risk of total bleeding appeared higher in the completely interrupted NOAC group compared with the minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.18-6.37), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.05-4.38) and uninterrupted warfarin (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.02-4.08). To reduce the risk of total bleeding, minimally interrupted NOACs (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.27), uninterrupted NOACs (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.42) and uninterrupted warfarin (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.15-0.39) were better than interrupted warfarin. In the event of major bleeding, there was no significant difference in the interrupted NOAC, uninterrupted NOAC, interrupted VKA and uninterrupted VKA groups.

Conclusions: These three NOAC strategies may have similar safety and efficacy in terms of thromboembolism and major bleeding complications. The total bleeding risk of completely interrupted oral anticoagulants is higher than that of uninterrupted and minimally interrupted NOACs. For thromboembolism, minimally interrupted NOACs, uninterrupted NOACs and continuous VKAs were better than interrupted warfarin.

Keywords: Anticoagulants; Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Thromboembolism; Total bleeding.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Ablation Techniques* / adverse effects
  • Administration, Oral
  • Aged
  • Anticoagulants* / administration & dosage
  • Anticoagulants* / adverse effects
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / diagnosis
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / epidemiology
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / physiopathology
  • Atrial Fibrillation* / therapy
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Heart Rate*
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Risk Factors
  • Stroke* / diagnosis
  • Stroke* / epidemiology
  • Stroke* / physiopathology
  • Stroke* / prevention & control
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Warfarin* / administration & dosage
  • Warfarin* / adverse effects

Substances

  • Anticoagulants
  • Warfarin