Gene Editing Clinical Trials Could Slip through Australian Regulatory Cracks

J Law Med. 2019 Dec;27(2):274-283.

Abstract

In this column we explore the regulatory environment within which clinical trials involving new genome editing techniques are undertaken. Ostensibly, there is regulatory congestion in this area, with overlapping obligations through the national scheme for regulating gene technology, the national scheme for regulating the supply of therapeutic goods, and the human research ethics system, predominantly administered at the institutional level. In practice, however, the oversight of gene editing clinical trials is left almost entirely to human research ethics committees. Given the uncertain risks associated with such novel technologies, we conclude that it is opportune to reconsider the rigour of current Australian processes for assessing clinical trials involving gene-editing technology.

Keywords: CRISPR; gene editing; gene technology regulation; human research ethics committees; therapeutic goods administration.

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • CRISPR-Cas Systems*
  • Clinical Trials as Topic / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Gene Editing / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Humans