Should Transplantation Still Be Considered for Ph1-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms in Transformation?

Abstract

BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in transformation have a dismal prognosis, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered the sole curative therapeutic option. We retrospectively analyzed 53 molecularly annotated patients treated at Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, diagnosed with MPN in transformation between 2008 and 2018. The median patient age was 65 years, and the median interval between MPN diagnosis and MPN transformation was 46 months. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort after transformation was 7.1 months. OS was better for patients treated with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or with chemotherapy compared than for those treated by best supportive care or single-agent targeted therapy (median, 9.1 months versus 1.5 months; P < .001). Patients treated with chemotherapy more often achieved complete remission compared with those treated with HMAs (68% versus 29%; P = .02), and were more often candidates for transplantation (59% versus 14%; P = .02), but the median OS was similar in the 2 groups. We then compared the outcomes in transplant recipients and nonrecipients using the Mantel-Byar methodology and found that allo-HSCT did not improve survival. In multivariate analysis, independent factors in prognosis were performance status at transformation (P < .01), initial treatment with HMAs or chemotherapy (P = .02), and the ability to achieve complete remission during follow-up (P < .01). Our data demonstrate that the indication for allo-HSCT for high-risk MPN should be discussed before transformation, because transplantation rescues few patients after transformation.

Keywords: Allogeneic transplantation; First-line treatment; Ph1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in transformation; Prognostic factors; Survival.