Construction and content validation of a measurement tool to evaluate person-centered therapeutic relationships in physiotherapy services

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 2;15(3):e0228916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228916. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to develop a tool for evaluating person-centered therapeutic relationships within physiotherapy services, and to examine the content validity of the same.

Methods: A mixed qualitative and quantitative study was performed in three distinct phases: 1) the items were generated based on a literature review and a content analysis of focus groups of patients and physiotherapists; 2) an e-Delphi survey process was performed based on three rounds to select and refine the proposed questionnaire; 3) two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted to evaluate the comprehension of items, the clarity of language and the appropriateness and relevance of content.

Results: Thirty-one items were generated based on the seven domains identified after the analysis of four focus groups of physiotherapists and four patient focus groups. Nine experts participated in the e-Delphi survey. Fifty-five patients participated in the two rounds of the cognitive pre-tests. Participating patients were from public and private physical therapy services. Based on the participants' suggestions, four items were removed, and four were added, whereas 16 were reworded.

Conclusions: The final tool comprised 31 items divided into seven domains. The response format was based on a 5-point Likert frequency scale. The response options ranged from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree".

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Delphi Technique
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Physical Therapists / psychology*
  • Physical Therapy Modalities*
  • Physical Therapy Specialty
  • Physician-Patient Relations*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Therapeutic Alliance

Grants and funding

Authors JMB, ORN, MMG, MLC, JBR are recipients of a grant from CEU Cardenal Herrera University (www.uchceu.es) and the San Pablo University-Santander Foundation (FUSP). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.