Aims: To identify areas that are difficult to access by the single scope at the time of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and examine the effectiveness, en-bloc, R0 resection, and perforation rate after changing to multibending scope at the same site.
Material and methods: When the direct visualization of the submucosal layer became impossible with Q260J or in the position where the device became vertical and peeling became impossible in parallel, we decided to change to the multibending 2TQ260M scope to record the position where the change was effective and the perforation rate.
Results: A total of 315 lesions were studied. Of the 12 sites, ESD was completed using the Q260J alone at four sites. The 2TQ260M scope was used with greater frequency at the fornix (88.9%) and on the line of the lesser curvature of the stomach (37.1%). In the cases with observed perforations (0.9%), the submucosal layer was not elevated due to the adhesion caused by strong fibrosis. None of the cases involving the change to 2TQ260M was ineffective, nor were perforations observed, and all resected specimens were en-bloc and R0 resections.
Conclusions: The success rate of this scope may help clinicians perform ESD with greater understanding.
Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; R0 resection; en-bloc resection; endoscope selection; multibending endoscope.