Fixed-combination Bimatoprost/Brimonidine/Timolol in Glaucoma: A Randomized, Masked, Controlled, Phase III Study Conducted in Brazil

Clin Ther. 2020 Feb;42(2):263-275. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

Abstract

Purpose: Many patients with open-angle glaucoma eventually require >2 medications to lower their intraocular pressure (IOP). Fixed-combination ophthalmic solutions can be advantageous in patients who require multiple medications, but the number of fixed combinations combining 3 complementary IOP-lowering agents remains limited. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a triple fixed combination (TFC) of bimatoprost 0.01%/brimonidine 0.15%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT), compared with a dual fixed combination (DFC) of brimonidine 0.2%/timolol 0.5%.

Methods: Patients with a baseline IOP of 23-34 mm Hg in both eyes and no history of IOP-lowering procedures were eligible for participation in this multicenter, double-masked, randomized, Phase III study. After washout of previous treatment (if applicable), patients were randomized to receive TFC or DFC twice daily in each eye for 3 months. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean IOP in the worse eye at week 12 in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. TFC was superior to DFC if the treatment difference (TFC - DFC) favored TFC at week 12 (P ≤ 0.05; 2-sample t test). Secondary and sensitivity analyses were also performed. Safety, including adverse events, was assessed at all visits.

Findings: The mITT/safety population included 185 patients (TFC, n = 90; DFC, n = 95). TFC superiority was demonstrated at all postbaseline visits (all, P < 0.001) through week 12 (week 12 treatment difference: ─2.17 mm Hg; 95% CI, ─3.12 to ─1.22). While treatment-related conjunctival hyperemia was more frequent with TFC than with DFC (47.8% vs 23.2%; P < 0.001), consistent with the additional presence of bimatoprost in TFC, most cases were mild and the numbers of patient discontinuations at week 12 were similar between the TFC and DFC groups (11 [12.2%] vs 7 [7.4%] patients; P = 0.266). No unexpected adverse events were reported.

Implications: Compared with DFC, TFC provided superior IOP lowering throughout the primary efficacy period. An acceptable tolerability profile was observed through 12 months of use of TFC, offering an effective therapeutic option in patients with POAG or OHT who require multiple medications to control their IOP. Additional studies are required for the assessment of the long-term effects of TFC. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01217606.

Keywords: bimatoprost; brimonidine tartrate; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; ocular hypertension; timolol.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antihypertensive Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Antihypertensive Agents / adverse effects
  • Bimatoprost / administration & dosage*
  • Bimatoprost / adverse effects
  • Brazil
  • Brimonidine Tartrate / administration & dosage*
  • Brimonidine Tartrate / adverse effects
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Combinations
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intraocular Pressure / drug effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ocular Hypertension / drug therapy*
  • Ophthalmic Solutions / administration & dosage*
  • Ophthalmic Solutions / adverse effects
  • Timolol / administration & dosage*
  • Timolol / adverse effects

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Drug Combinations
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Brimonidine Tartrate
  • Timolol
  • Bimatoprost

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01217606