Ten golden rules for a safe MIS inguinal hernia repair using a new anatomical concept as a guide

Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1458-1464. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07449-z. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Abstract

Background: Although laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was described about 30 years ago and advantages of the technique have been demonstrated, the utilization of this approach has not been what we would expect. Some reasons may be the need for surgeons to understand the posterior anatomy of the groin from a new vantage point, as well as to acquire advanced laparoscopic skills. Recently, however, the introduction of a robotic approach has dramatically increased the adoption of minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

Methods: Important recent contributions to this evolution have been the establishment of a new concept known as the critical view of the Myopectineal Orifice (MPO) and the description of a new way of understanding the posterior view of the antomy of the groin (inverted Y and the five triangles). In this paper, we describe 10 rules for a safe MIS inguinal hernia repair (TAPP, TEP, ETEP, RTAPP) that combines these two new concepts in a unique way.

Conclusions: As the critical view of safety has made laparoscopic cholecystectomy safer, we feel that following our ten rules based on understanding the anatomy of the posterior groin as defined by zones and essential triangles and the technical steps to achieve the critical view of the MPO will foster the goal of safe MIS hernia repair, no matter which minimally invasive technique is employed.

Keywords: Critical view; Golden rules; Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic.

Publication types

  • Editorial

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / methods
  • Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / standards*
  • Groin / surgery*
  • Hernia, Inguinal / surgery*
  • Herniorrhaphy / methods
  • Herniorrhaphy / standards*
  • Humans
  • Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery / methods
  • Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery / standards*
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / standards