[Risk factors and management strategies for early and late infections following reconstruction with special tumour endoprostheses]

Orthopade. 2020 Feb;49(2):142-148. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03872-1.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of megaprostheses occur in about 10% of all cases. The criteria for PJI are defined by the "Musculoskleletal Infection Society" (MSIS) and apply to both primary arthroplasty and megaprostheses.

Management: The management strategies of PJI in megaprostheses are dependent on the duration of infection and the maturity of the bacterial biofilm. Implant retention with an exchange of the mobile components is only possible in the presence of an immature biofilm. In the presence of a mature biofilm, a one- or two-stage exchange must be performed. A complete exchange of all endoprosthetic components should be performed, if possible, since a partial retention of isolated components results in inferior treatment success rates.

Results: The highest success rates are achievable with two-stage exchanges. Multiple risk factors such as skin necrosis, postoperative haematoma, prolonged wound secretion and operative times ≥ 2.5 h are risk factors for the development of PJI in megaprostheses. Knowledge regarding these risk factors allows for an identification of high-risk patients and early management of PJI.

Keywords: Biofilm; Bone Cancer; Endoprosthesis; Prosthesis failure; Prosthesis-related infections.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Humans
  • Knee Prosthesis*
  • Neoplasms*
  • Prostheses and Implants
  • Prosthesis-Related Infections*
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents