Is the Landing Error Scoring System Reliable and Valid? A Systematic Review

Sports Health. 2020 Mar/Apr;12(2):181-188. doi: 10.1177/1941738119886593. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Abstract

Context: The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a clinical tool often used in research and practice to identify athletes presenting high injury-risk biomechanical patterns during a jump-landing task.

Objective: To systematically review the literature addressing the psychometric properties of the LESS.

Data sources: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched on March 28, 2018, using the term "Landing Error Scoring System."

Study selection: All studies using the LESS as main outcome measure and addressing its reliability, validity against motion capture system, and predictive validity were included. Original English-language studies published in peer-reviewed journals were reviewed. Studies using modified versions of the LESS were excluded.

Study design: Systematic literature review.

Level of evidence: Level 4.

Data extraction: Study design, population, LESS testing procedures, LESS scores, statistical analysis, and main results were extracted from studies using a standardized template.

Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria and were appraised using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies. The overall LESS score demonstrated good-to-excellent intrarater (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.82-0.99), interrater (ICC, 0.83-0.92), and intersession reliability (ICC, 0.81). The validity of the overall LESS score against 3-dimensional jump-landing biomechanics was good when individuals were divided into 4 quartiles based on LESS scores. The validity of individual LESS items versus 3-dimensional motion capture data was moderate-to-excellent for most of the items addressing key risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. The predictive value of the LESS for ACL and other noncontact lower-extremity injuries remains uncertain based on the current scientific evidence.

Conclusion: The LESS is a reliable screening tool. However, further work is needed to improve the LESS validity against motion capture system and confirm its predictive validity for ACL and other noncontact lower-extremity injuries.

Keywords: injury prevention; injury risk; jump-landing; movement screen; sport injury.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Exercise Test / methods*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Lower Extremity / injuries*
  • Plyometric Exercise*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Assessment / methods*
  • Risk Factors