Tumor burden and location as prognostic factors in patients treated by iodine seed implant brachytherapy for localized prostate cancers

Radiat Oncol. 2019 Dec 31;15(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1449-z.

Abstract

Background: Iodine seed implant brachytherapy is indicated for low risk and selected favorable intermediate risk prostate cancers. A percentage of positive biopsies > 50% is usually considered as a contra-indication, and the tumor location could also influence the treatment efficacy. We studied the association of the percentage of positive biopsy cores, and tumor location, with progression-free survival.

Methods: Among the 382 patients treated at our center by permanent implant iodine seed brachytherapy for a localized prostate cancer between 2006 and 2013, 282 had accessible detailed pathology reports, a minimum follow-up of 6 months, and were included. Progression was defined as a biochemical, local, nodal, or distant metastatic relapse. We studied cancer location on biopsies (base, midgland or apex of the prostate) and percentage of positive biopsy cores, as well as potential confounders (pre-treatment PSA, tumor stage, Gleason score, risk group according to D'Amico's classification modified by Zumsteg, adjunction of androgen deprivation therapy, and dosimetric data).

Results: Most patients (197; 69.9%) had a low risk, 67 (23.8%) a favorable intermediate risk, 16 (5.7%) an unfavorable intermediate risk, and 1 (0.3%) a high-risk prostate cancer. An involvement of the apex was found for 131 patients (46,5%), of the midgland for 149 (52,8%), and of the base for 145 (51,4%). The median percentage of positive biopsy cores was 17% [3-75%]. The median follow-up was 64 months [12-140]. Twenty patients (7%) progressed: 4 progressions (20%) were biochemical only, 7 (35%) were prostatic or seminal, 6 (30%) were nodal, and 3 (15%) were metastatic. The median time to failure was 39.5 months [9-108]. There were more Gleason scores ≥7 among patients who progressed (40% vs 19%; p = 0.042). None of the studied covariates (including tumor location, and percentage of positive biopsy cores), were significantly associated with progression-free survival. The risk group showed a trend towards an association (p = 0.055).

Conclusions: Brachytherapy is an efficient treatment (5-year control rate of 93%) for patients carefully selected with classical criteria. The percentage and location of positive biopsies were not significantly associated with progression-free survival. A Gleason score ≥ 7 was more frequent in case of progression.

Keywords: Gleason score; Iodine seed implant brachytherapy; Prostate biopsies; Prostate cancer; Risk groups; Tumor burden.

MeSH terms

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Biopsy
  • Brachytherapy / methods*
  • Disease Progression
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Iodine Radioisotopes / therapeutic use*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / pathology
  • Prognosis
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen / blood
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / mortality
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / radiotherapy*
  • Radiometry
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Tumor Burden*

Substances

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Iodine Radioisotopes
  • Prostate-Specific Antigen