Is Reconstruction of Large Mandibular Defects Using Bioengineering Materials Effective?

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Apr;78(4):661.e1-661.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.024. Epub 2019 Dec 2.

Abstract

Purpose: Clinical tissue engineering has revolutionized surgery by improving surgical efficiency and decreasing the risks associated with traditional bone graft procurement techniques. Compared with autogenous bone grafts, composite tissue-engineered grafts fulfill the principles of osteoconduction, osteoinduction, and osteogenesis and provide adequate bone volume for maxillofacial reconstruction with less morbidity. The present study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness, as defined by our success criteria, of a composite tissue-engineered bone graft in the reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Patients and methods: We implemented a retrospective case series and enrolled a sample of patients with mandibular defects that had been reconstructed using allogeneic bone combined with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 and bone marrow aspirate concentrate at our institution during a 5-year period. The success criteria were as follows: 1) bone union, defined as a homogenous radiopaque pattern continuous with native bone without mandibular mobility; and 2) volume of grafted bone adequate for implant placement, defined as at least 1.0 cm (height) by 0.8 cm (width). Clinical examinations and computed tomography scans were performed at 6 months postoperatively. Descriptive statistics were computed for each variable.

Results: From 2014 to 2019, tissue engineering reconstruction was used in 31 patients with and 3 patients without mandibular continuity defects, for a total of 34 patients. The median follow-up was 6 months. The mean length of the continuity defects was 5.5 cm (range, 1.0 to 12.5). Of the 30 patients with mandibular continuity defects, 27 achieved success according to our criteria, with an average gained height of 2.12 ± 0.64 cm and width of 1.53 ± 0.46 cm. Of the 34 patients, 1 was lost to follow-up, and treatment failed in 3 patients.

Conclusions: Although the use of autogenous graft remains the reference standard, the evolving science behind clinical tissue engineering has resulted in an effective treatment modality for complex head and neck defects with less morbidity and graft material equal to that of autogenous bone.

MeSH terms

  • Bioengineering
  • Bone Regeneration
  • Bone Transplantation
  • Humans
  • Mandible*
  • Mandibular Reconstruction*
  • Retrospective Studies