[Consensus of infectious complications in patients treated with selected biological therapies: first Part]

Rev Chilena Infectol. 2019 Oct;36(5):608-615. doi: 10.4067/S0716-10182019000500608.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

The use of biological therapies has meant a great improvement in the management of several conditions like autoimmune, neoplastic or others diseases. Although its use has implied significant improvements in the prognosis of these diseases, it is not exempt from complications: infectious diseases as one of them. The objective of this consensus was to evaluate, from an infectious viewpoint, the safeness of the most frequently used biological therapies and give recommendations for the prevention of infections in patients treated with these drugs. These recommendations were based on the highest quality evidence available for the selected biologics. The consensus counts of two manuscripts. This first part details the risks of developing infectious complications depending on the type of biological used for a certain pathology. This evaluation included a broad search in MEDLINE and Epistemonikos of systematic reviews and meta-analyzes of controlled clinical trials and casecontrol examining post-treatment infections with anti-TNF alpha, anti-CD20, anti-CD52, CTLA4-Ig and anti-integrins. The research was complemented by a review of: multicentre cohorts of biological users, the MMWR of the CDC, Atlanta, U.S.A., and national registers and scientific societies in which infectious complications derived from the use of biological therapies were mentioned.

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / adverse effects*
  • Biological Therapy / adverse effects*
  • Biological Therapy / standards
  • Chile
  • Communicable Diseases / chemically induced*
  • Consensus*
  • Humans
  • Opportunistic Infections / chemically induced
  • Opportunistic Infections / prevention & control
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal